Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Management Studies, IIT Roorkee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. (non-admin closure) f eminist 10:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Management Studies, IIT Roorkee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This department doesn't seem to be independently notable, because there is no substantial coverage in independent sources. Redirection to the school's article has been repeatedly reverted. This AfD is intended to clarify the consensus to keep this page a redirect. Slashme (talk) 13:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. I suggest delete&redirect, due to multiple previous reverts of the redirect. I did a pretty extensive source check, and I'd like to congratulate the IP editor who pushed this to AFD and full source check. I did find ONE good source for notability, the Hindustan Times reporting charges that the Department was putting false information in it's admission brochure.[1] That alone not enough to keep the article, but if additional good sources are supplied then we keep the article AND we include this source too. We'll just need to dig up an editor with Highbeam access to read the full article. Alsee (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested, and it's cheap. Bearian (talk) 23:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.