Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill, Back, Dallaglio
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:04, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hill, Back, Dallaglio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about a partnership of three England rugby union players. No reliable sources are referenced. The subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG, and the article reads more like a newspaper than an encyclopedia article. Relevant material could be sourced and merged with the main England rugby team article, but a stand alone article is not necessary. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —Favonian (talk) 10:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I vote keep -- obviously, bad faith nomination.' This is a famous back row unit who started 38 matches together, including the 2003 world cup final. Sir Francis Drake (not really!) (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Copyvio of [1] removed. noq (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The individual players are notable, the England rugby union team is notable, but please provide reliable sources to support the assertion that a particular combination of players for a selection of positions is notable enough to warrant its own article. Nouse4aname (talk) 14:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The article content is perfectly relevant. You are only allowed to vote once and you've already had your say. Sir Francis Drake (not really!) (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a vote. It is a discussion. We do not tally up the votes for and against at the end. We weigh up the arguments. There may be 10 people saying "keep", but if they do not provide valid reasoning then they do not count for much. Nouse4aname (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The article content is perfectly relevant. You are only allowed to vote once and you've already had your say. Sir Francis Drake (not really!) (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The individual players are notable, the England rugby union team is notable, but please provide reliable sources to support the assertion that a particular combination of players for a selection of positions is notable enough to warrant its own article. Nouse4aname (talk) 14:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliable sources backing up that this is a notable combination of players. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this user clearly knows nothing about rugby and is engaged in a personal vendetta. Sir Francis Drake (not really!) (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unreferenced. Please note, just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they no nothing and have a personal vendetta against you. noq (talk) 11:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep But could really do with more sources and that matches started section needs serious cleaning up. It's not a complete rubbish page, just needs a bit of work on it. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:SYNTH. Stifle (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.