Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsen Emadi
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 15:09, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 15:09, 2 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Per lack of RS. MBisanz talk 02:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Mohsen Emadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Mohsen Emadi is a non-notable person failing WP:BIO. Sadra2010 (talk) 18:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Considering the published books and news articles (links on external links section) makes him a notable person. You can find more on Google:"Mohsen.Emadi poet" , etc. My vote's to keep the article. —BEHNAM〈☯|☮〉@20090129145745%UTC 14:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete--the list is impressive, but I can't find anything in Google Books or News. More damningly, as far as I'm concerned, no hits in the MLA. Drmies (talk) 04:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.