Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Fleming (Entrepreneur)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Ivanvector (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 2 February 2022 (→‎Olga Fleming (Entrepreneur): Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW, and also speedy delete per WP:G5. If someone who is not a banned editor would like to create an article on this person, they will need to start from scratch and demonstrate with reliable sources that this person meets the general notability guideline. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Fleming (Entrepreneur)[edit]

Olga Fleming (Entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is some sort of COI/Paid article (throwaway account with just enough edits to launch article into mainspace) with the flimsiest references, only one of which seems to be about the subject). It's riddled with weasel PR; subject is, in essence, a finsec Mother Theresa. But mainly, there's no evidence that the subject is notable, and it's thoroughly objectionable to see wikipedia co-opted for this sort of PR bullshit. Tagishsimon (talk) 10:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A published writer, seems sufficiently referenced. Seasider53 (talk) 11:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Seasider53: The books looks to be self-published. Inside it is no mention of any publishing company....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Notability for a writer is not established by using Google Books to source the fact that the books exist, it's established by using media coverage about the books to source the fact that they've been externally validated as significant (award wins, critical attention from professional literary critics, etc.) Bearcat (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.