Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zettai ryouiki
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:51, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:51, 2 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was 'speedy delete - UtherSRG (talk) 19:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Zettai ryouiki[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Zettai ryouiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
foreign dicdef. delete UtherSRG (talk) 00:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sources have been provided which show that it is prominent in modern Japanese culture. --Jean-Luc Pikachu (talk) 00:34, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Since when was "foreign dicdef" grounds for deletion? And it appears to be a major part of Japanese culture. 53,000 Engligh ghits. Notability is clearly established. ALI nom nom 00:43, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Since when is a "foreign dicdef" grounds for deletion? Since it's a dictionary definition per WP:NOTDICT. The "foreign" part is irrelevant.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unless actual reliable sources can be found to establish notability and expand beyond current stub state. GHits are not sufficient proof of notability.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Appears to be notable, and being a stub is not grounds for deletion. --E2eamon (talk) 03:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, it already exists on Wiktionary, and this is a dictdef. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 06:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dictionary definition adequately covered in Wiktionary. --DAJF (talk) 02:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy Deletion as reposting of article previously deleted following AfD. No new material is provided in this version. --DAJF (talk) 12:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nice catch of the alternate spelling.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've speedied this, but I've forgetten what to do to close the AFD. Gimme a couple to figure it out. :D - UtherSRG (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.