Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Brandt
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:43, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to California's 46th congressional district#2004. ‑Scottywong| speak _ 18:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jim Brandt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Failed political candidates are not normally notable, and he doesn't seem to be notable as a businessman either (there are several companies/products called Pyramid Software but none seem very notable). The only reliable sources I can find are routine coverage of the elections. And no substantial edits since 2007 indicates he's not getting any more famous. (Note that Googling returns multiple Jim Brandts; but none of the others are notable either.) Colapeninsula (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. If he runs again and finds success, we might have to revisit this, but I don't see the notability at present. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect- Where he is already suitably mentioned at California's 46th congressional district#2004, and visible in the 2006 elections immediately below; interested readers can then navigate to United States House of Representatives elections, 2004 or United States House of Representatives elections, 2006, and the California-specific articles and sections from there. Dru of Id (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect We normally redirect unsuccessful political candidates to the election they ran in, but since he ran more than once I think Dru of Id's suggestion is the best one. Note: This article is basically an unsourced BLP. --MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.