Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asgar Ali Chowdhury Mosque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:55, 2 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Asgar Ali Chowdhury Mosque[edit]

Asgar Ali Chowdhury Mosque (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged by WikiDan61 as unreferenced when it was created in February 2016. Author has continued to tinker with it, but has never added a source. Searches of the usual Google types, De Gruyter, EBSCO, Gale, HighBeam, JSTOR, Project Muse, ProQuest, and nine national newspapers in Bangladesh, found a single mention, in an article by a master's student in IJSER, a journal on Beall's list of "Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access journals."[1] The article is about the acoustics of the mosque built in 2015 to replace this one, but does contain two sentences about the old mosque. It does not cite a source for those sentences, but thanks the Asgar Ali Chowdhury Jame Moshjid committee.[2]

If the community considers this a reliable source, I have no objection to merging what it supports (which isn't much of the stub) to the "Places" section of Halishahar Thana. In any case it is not significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, so the topic does not meet WP:GNG or WP:GEOFEAT and should not be a stand alone article. Worldbruce (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - google maps has it as Chowdhury Para Mosjid [3] (based on picture and map in IJSER paper). I would generally be for keeping articles on mosques if they pass even a generous reading of GNG or WP:GEOFEAT, but I don't find anything in this case. Smmurphy(Talk) 10:59, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.