Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucilene Caetano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 19:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucilene Caetano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with a lack of significant independent coverage. Most references are company announcements.Mdtemp (talk) 20:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 23:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete The coverage seems to focus on her getting and changing jobs, but it's weak on explaining why she's notable. I don't think that just appearing on TV makes someone notable. If kept, the article needs to be rewritten. Papaursa (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Lacks the coverage required by GNG and I don't see any real claims of notability. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notableish in her own country as a TV presenter, having a martial arts side is not a reason to delete. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 15:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing the coverage necessary to meet GNG. I agree that martial arts has nothing to do with her notability, but simply being on TV is not grounds for automatic notability. Jakejr (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete May be notable, but I can't find the supporting evidence for it and the article doesn't give me enough to say WP:GNG is met.Astudent0 (talk) 19:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.