Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Helicopter
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:36, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:36, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sr13 07:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Black Helicopter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The subject does not meet the criteria for notability per WP:MUSIC. I can only find one album and it is not even listed in the article. No significant media coverage. Nv8200p talk 19:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No multiple non-trivial sources asserted. I could only find a MySpace link to this band. Spellcast 19:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]- After Chubbles added all those sources with non-trivial mentions, I changed my decision to keep. Spellcast 22:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. - Philippe | Talk 19:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not sure where you're looking, but a couple search engines brought up a bunch of results. They're getting a fair bit of media coverage (no surprise, when you're on Thurston Moore's label...). Added five nontrivial media sources. Chubbles 22:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep as revised. No evidence of a national tour? --Dhartung | Talk 23:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it seems they did in March of this year. Added another source (requires a subscription, but the key sentence showed up in a Yahoo cache). Chubbles 23:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per the work done by Chubbles - nice work. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 02:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If you look at the diff between the original AFD notice and now, there's no comparison. Good work, Chubbles, and the notability and refs are there. Shalom Hello 03:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Clearly meets WP:BAND. Closenplay 14:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are now plenty of 3rd party reliable sources to establish notability per WP:Music. Cricket02 05:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.