Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hair museum
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:34, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:34, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 03:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hair museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be mostly about one museum of questionable notability. Article has a plethora of other issues. Also added Leila's Hair Museum to this discussion, as it is a copy of this page, also concerning a questionably notable place Purplebackpack89 (talk) 04:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean up Leila's Hair Museum; there has been an attempt to add sources, and more material is available. The museum has been the subject of newspaper articles spanning more than a decade [1], [2] and is discussed in many books [3]. There are at least a couple other hair museums in the world (one in French Lick, Indiana, and one in Turkey), so there may also be use for an article at Hair museum, but I'm not sure yet. Zagalejo^^^ 06:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep both articles. Both are notable subjects. The Hair museum article should focus less on Leila's museum. They both need a good edit. - Richard Cavell (talk) 13:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.