Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olli Hokkanen
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:21, 4 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:21, 4 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Olli Hokkanen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a BLP of a young man "notable" for drinking 1.5 litres of Coca-Cola on a Finnish television show. The rest of the article is a BLP nightmare.
Even the Finnish Wikipedia thought him unnotable and deleted their version.[1] Scott Mac (Doc) 23:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO, WP:N, and, as the article claims, is notable for only one event, then that does not constitute "notability". My two cents. Cheers. I'mperator 23:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: the assertions of notability are predicated on his having failed to drink that much cola. I feel that in this matter, we should emulate the Finnish Wikipedia. DS (talk) 23:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Probably not notable per above, but there does seem to be a fair amount of 3rd party coverage of this: [2]. Apparently it is a small-moderate Internet phenomenon per article and 1.6M hits for Original 2006 video and 2M+ hits for related videos [3]. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability implies something notable Any amount of internet notice for nothing still = nothing. DGG (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Well Star Wars Kid and Numa Numa Guy didn't exactly do anything inherently notable either. Sometimes one can be notable just for being noticed. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: He's supposedly notable for one event, and that one event is something that isn't notable itself (drinking/failing to drink a quantity of liquid), so I don't really see how he's notable enough for Wikipedia. His name could, however, be added to one of those lists on Internet Memes or some such. Nick (talk) 11:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nick. He says it all. Bearian (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Nick and Bearian. Also agree that he fails WP:BLP. Oldlaptop321 (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, and I'm not at all sure this shouldn't be speedied immediately. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete/delete for now The individual seems to be WP:BLP1E. However, he has also entered the news for criminal accusations independent of his attempted beverage consumption. Regardless, there's a clear claim of notability so speedy deletion would be out of process and a very bad idea. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per DGG. Possibly mention in some appropriate list of internet memes. Sandstein 17:57, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.