Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Adjetey
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:51, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:51, 5 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 18:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Emmanuel Adjetey[edit]
- Emmanuel Adjetey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no evidence of notability Spiderone (talk) 16:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Spiderone (talk) 16:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Spiderone accepted that Ghana Premier League is professional and added this to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues : [1]. --Ilion2 (talk) 10:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; non-notable footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE. GiantSnowman 16:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Meets WP:N - [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], and many more. Nfitz (talk) 03:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is still irrelevant as he hasn't played in a professional league. Spiderone (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How can it be irrelevant? If he meets WP:N it doesn't matter if he doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. Are you suggesting that an article be deleted because you think WP:ATHLETE is more important than WP:N? Nfitz (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is still irrelevant as he hasn't played in a professional league. Spiderone (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - plays in a notable African league. The sources included above are not irrelevant. Eldumpo (talk) 20:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The fact that the ruling body of the Ghana Premier League is known as the Professional League Board would imply that this is a professional league. Is it just me or is anyone else finding these nominations a little disruptive? Surely, if the issue is whether a particlular league is professional, the discussion should be in one place rather than spread over multiple AfDs. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment all of the sources are trivial name-checks in match reports, thus they do not pass WP:GNG. --Jimbo[online] 20:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the lack of African media on the Internet, that we are getting so many name checks suggests notability. Football is big in Ghana, and the population of the country is much bigger than nations such as Portugal, Holland, or Greece. It's systemic bias to try an eliminate the top footballers of such countries. Nfitz (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Plays for a club in the Ghana Premier League, a professional league as you can read since today in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues [8]. --Ilion2 (talk) 10:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.