Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Horne (radio)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:45, 5 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:45, 5 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. The nominator has had his chance to provide a valid reason for deletion and has failed to do so. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Horne (radio)[edit]
- Tony Horne (radio) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
a number of inaccuracies Frdbr (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can those inaccuracies be fixed by normal editing? If not, why not? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The reason suggested for deletion is not a valid reason to delete the page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can we have this discussion closed? The nominator failed to provide an adequate reason for deletion and has not edited Wikipedia at all since then. This probably should have been a speedy close, rather than keeping the discussion open indefinitely. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Default to keep I'm not sure if Horne's departure from Metro Radio ([1]) days before this nomination has anything to do with it, but this isn't a nomination that's given us anything to work with so.. Someoneanother 17:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.