Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Career domains in computer science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Career domains in computer science

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tries to sound like an instructional article on jobs available in Computer Science. Users can reasonable infer jobs from main Computer Science article. No valid citations and no editors have made significant contributions since 2007. Inomyabcs (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unstructured, unencyclopaedic, no refs (the single cite is dead) and smells of WP:OR or WP:NOTHOWTO. Looks like a new editor had an idea in good faith a few years ago but its lost its way and ended up a dead end. --ThePaintedOne (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, mostly per nom and ThePaintedOne. As far as "career domains" go, it's amazingly narrow in scope (not even a mention of web development.) IT really doesn't mention anything not covered in the List of software engineering topics or Outline of computer science#Vocations, which is all that is really necessary on the topic. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû _(blah?) 23:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Huh??? EEng (talk) 23:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While it might be possible to write an article on this subject, this isn't going to go anywhere. —Ruud 23:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no careers in computer science. They hire you when you've got no experience and when you get to around 32 they replace you with somebody with no experience. This article is hypothetical. You could replace the article with the career of a hen in a battery hen house since there would be little relative difference. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 14:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: At best it's almost entirely incomplete and unsourced. Concentrating on the stuff that's present, rather than missing, it's tangential and unreadable. The only way to turn it into an encyclopaedia article - and I'm not sure we need one under this title, there's other coverage elsewhere - would be to start from scratch. bobrayner (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.