Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montessori on the iPad
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:41, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Montessori on the iPad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I will be happy to see reliable sources establishing the notability of this topic, but the article doesn't provide them. A Google News search generates hits for the combination of the words "Montessori on the iPad", but I found nothing there that's reliable and discusses the topic--if it actually is a topic. I also looked for the individual applications and found nothing that suggests they are notable. In all, I believe this to be an invented topic, with elements that are individually not notable, and mostly an effort (made in good faith, no doubt) to promote a number of applications and the brand name they carry. Drmies (talk) 05:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original synthesis to put these together. Also, creator of article seems to work for Rantek, the developer of 3 of the 6 discussed apps (he/she states "I am one of the developers of this application" on a page discussing another Rantek app -- a page she also created) [[1]]. So I'm seeing a clear WP:COI violation here. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.