Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nik and Sam (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:55, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:55, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nik and Sam[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Nik and Sam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Last AFD closed as keep due to sources, but a closer examination shows them to be 2 sources promoting concerts, 1 directory listing from Radio Disney and a PR piece from an agency. I fail to see how any of this meets WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Google News turns up only false positives. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Feed them to the ottersDelete per nom. IIRC, they need to at least have an album out or some kind of major press coverage before we give them an article... TallNapoleon (talk) 06:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep – I added a few more citations, hoping that more could be found. But the few articles in Arkansas Times and in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, combined with a couple of appearances on Good Morning Arkansas on KATV Little Rock, together are enough for a weak keep recommendation. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.