Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rufus Books

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:39, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rufus Books

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable and independent source found on the subject. Not notable enough to be featured in an encyclopedia. Dial911 (talk) 03:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find no reliable source coverage either — even on a ProQuest search to catch older coverage that might not show up on Google, I got exactly zero hits for this at all. Bearcat (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable small company failing all criterion of WP:CORP. The page itself seems written like essay just for the sake of company's existence — Ammarpad (talk) 06:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.