Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo Dogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Halo Dogs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted as WP:NOTADVERT. If that's not enough, referencing is terrible including WP:DAILYMAIL and citations in the "media work" section are useless blurbs like this one: "Their playmates were the other dogs I looked after at Halo Dogs". Local non-notable awards like Enterprise Enfield Start up Business Award don't add anything to corp notability. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - an advert for doggie daycare. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 05:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advert. I checked the refs, they are all 404s, trivial mentions, primary or simply unrelated to the subject. Szzuk (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.