Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Lim
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 10:16, 7 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Evelyn Lim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if this piano instructor passes WP:PROF. The only real coverage I can find about her is from a blog about piano teachers; and as for the company she works for, Abundance Tapestry, all I can really say about that is that it exists. The article is pretty much orphaned and the article creator hasn't been on Wikipedia since the article was created in 2007. (The subject is not to be confused with pornstar Evelyn Lin.) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 18:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 18:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I really struggle to see on any level how a piano teacher qualifies, unless they taught multiple people who went on to achieve great success. Otherwise I tend to assume that, by definition, they are teaching because they couldn't make more of their talent. --Legis (talk - contribs) 21:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
She is not just an ordinary piano teacher. You have mistaken her for another individual. She chairs the Singapore Organ Guild and teaches at the Methodist School of Music and is doctorally qualified. She is one of the main driving forces of church organ music in Singapore. You have mistaken her for someone else. I have personally attended alot of the events for championing organ music that she hosts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derrida79 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC) — Derrida79 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Keep - I've found a few references to the article to verify educational claims and found concert reviews demonstrating some level of notability. I'm sure there are more out there, and don't see why this article can't be further improved.--Stvfetterly (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- All three of those references you added only mention her name in passing. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 11:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Right . . . but the AFD nomination says that the only source you could find was a blog. Additional sources are for WP:V. I figure the concert review indicates at least some level of WP:N.--Stvfetterly (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- All three of those references you added only mention her name in passing. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 11:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 21:49, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 20:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.