Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Jackets Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Black Jackets Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof whatsoever in the references or our there on Google that this is a notable organization. It reads a bit hoaxy, though it's probably just a club founded with some humor. Anyway, there's nothing here nor there to support notability. Drmies (talk) 04:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: "post-scolopéndric" (after the centipede?) does indeed make it look hoaxy, though I suspect spam rather than a real hoax. The Notes and References are merely contact details. The External links seem to have been added by Kolp to promote himself. There are a fair number of hits on Google but they look like primary sources. --Stfg (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Hoax or not, lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Fails to meet the requirements of any of our notability guidelines by a wide mile. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find any reliable sources to establish notability — as DV says, not by a wide mile — and man what a lot of redlinks. Post-scolopéndric, the art movement the company "supports" (?) seems to be unknown to Google as well as to Wikipedia, although "Scolopendric" is a character in World of Warcraft.[1] Might the black-jacket composers possibly be gamers? Anyway. Not sure why you didn't PROD it, Drmies. Bishonen | talk 14:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]
- I don't believe in PROD, except for BLP PROD... Drmies (talk) 15:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.