Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Garrison High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As unverifiable. Sandstein 06:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Global Garrison High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is for-profit private school so it has to pass WP:GNG which it fails. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing the basic test of WP:VERIFY, let alone WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails the basic tests of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. Being private is utterly irrelevant. Not sure why the nominator thinks it makes a difference. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Failing our core policy WP:V. Störm (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure - unclear that this school exists, yet to find anything reliable showing that it does. JMWt (talk) 19:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - infobox URL link is dead, no Google results, did find a Garrison Global in Cincinnati.[[1]] Not the same. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 02:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:VERIFY... Secondary schools have precedent to be included so long as their existence can be verified... which can't be accomplished with this one. Operator873^CONNECT 02:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.