Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven and Lloyd Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 01:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steven and Lloyd Productions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable Youtube video site, sources don't satisfy WP:V and WP:WEB. Page appears to have been posted by site owner. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:02, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Checked the refs, they're YouTube "entrepreneurs" as noted by the nom. Probably students, its nothing I couldn't do right now. Szzuk (talk) 11:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems to be notable. The Vanderbilt Hustler are pretty notable references; as for the others I don't know. Maybe needs more references? Shengzuh (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Vanderbilt Hustler is a student-run newspaper, and while I'm not trying to slam a student newspaper, it seems unreasonable to place a student newspaper on the same level of reliability as a state or national news source. The group has had a few videos picked up (although the Comedy Central assertion is unsourced. There evidence that this production group has been the subject of independent commentary in reliable sources is weak. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 01:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.