Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrically converted water
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:17, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 12:17, 10 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. And then redirect to Electrolysis of water. Sandstein 06:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Electrically converted water (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spammy article with unreliable references, promoting a fringe product. The "references" are all based on press releases from the company that invented the product. Fails WP:SPAM, WP:RS andy (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Electrolysis of water if not outright deletion. I can't make scientific sense of this article. Is it claiming that electrolyzing water into H2 and O2 then recombining them makes something other than normal water? Also, it seems to me that the article might be rewritable into something non-adverty, on the off chance the concept holds up under verifiability. (I'll wager half of what Wikipedia pays me as an editor that the concept won't hold, you know.) --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Promotion of a non-notable concept used by Tennant Company. Two of the article's sources appear to be press releases; the third one focuses on the company and doesn't discuss the subject in detail. While the subject of Water Electrolysis is undoubtedly notable, Google shows no apparent signs of independent notability for "electrically converted water": [1], [2]. — Rankiri (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. shoy (reactions) 01:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above arguments, or redirect as a second choice. Chutznik (talk) 02:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.