Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Super Bowl jersey colors worn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Super Bowl jersey colors worn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:NOTSTATS. The only significance is that teams in white jerseys have been unusually dominant in recent Super Bowls, but this can easily be mentioned on the main Super Bowl page in a sentence or two (and it already is). Lizard (talk) 02:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 03:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 03:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't need its own article, not to mention the "Losing/Winning Team Home or Away" columns are confusing as hell. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 03:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is covered, in excessive detail, in Super Bowl#Home team designation. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per Clarityfiend. We don't need a whole article dedicated to what colours teams wore on a particular game. Just the home/away designation is fine. Ajf773 (talk) 03:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? Delete per Clarityfiend. ansh 666 04:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTSTATS doesn't apply (as there is no "excessive listings of unexplained statistics"/"statistics that lack context"), but this list fails WP:TRIVIA ("Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous information.") and WP:LISTN (not "discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources"). Cbl62 (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable trivial list. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cbl62. This is pure WP:LISTCRUFT. – Pee Jay 09:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Cbl62 and nom. SportingFlyer (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:IGNORE -- In case there is a rule of some kind to keep this article, let's just ignore it and delete the article to make Wikipedia better.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete much as I sympathize with the editor who spent so much time putting this together, I'm afraid it is too trivial. Lepricavark (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.