Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UltraMon
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:30, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:30, 11 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
UltraMon[edit]
- UltraMon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A Google search reveals almost no sources that would incur notability to this piece of software (in fact, only one Lifehacker article). Jasper Deng (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's all about sources and it looks like they exist. The vendor's reviews page has a lot of broken or unhelpful links but it does list reviews by PC World, InformationWeek that appear to satisfy WP:GNG. Msnicki (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: the article looks promotional, but the topic may happen to pass WP:GNG: at least I found several sources, though I'm not sure about reliability: review (unsure about WP:SPS, see the notice at the bottom of the article),[1] blog of Microsoft employee (he should have an expertise excluding him from WP:SPS; or no?),[2] Microsoft itself,[3] review at TechRepublic (by editor called "Guest Contributor"!!!, but deep and well-written),[4] Maximum PC's review,[5] and some news site alike (but who knows?).[6] — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
References:
- ^ Taylor, Chris. "UltraMon 2.1". Product Review. Ottawa PC Users' Group. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- ^ Hanselman, Scott (2009-12-31). "The (Near) Final Word on Multi-Monitor Taskbars for Windows 7 - Ultramon vs. DisplayFusion". Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- ^ Steen, Greg (April 2008). "Toolbox". TechNet. Microsoft. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- ^ "SolutionBase: Add invaluable functionality to a multiple monitor setup with UltraMon". TechRepublic. 2004-06-22. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- ^ Castle, Alex (2008-10-20). "Beyond Ultramon: Free Software Solutions for Multiple Monitors". Maximum PC. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- ^ Bhatnagar, Abhishek (2009-04-28). "UltraMon – The Best Smart Application For Multi Monitor Setup". technixupdate. Retrieved 2012-01-05.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.