Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Au rythme des déluges
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:50, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 03:50, 12 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Au rythme des déluges (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not meet the notability criteria for books WP:NB Koppas (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I admit that there's a language barrier here, but even with Google translator I cannot find any articles about this book. There's just nothing out there to show that this book has any notability.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete The equivalent French article is also flagged for notability: [1]. That aside, while this book is mentioned in passing in a brief profile of the author, that isn't enough and this two sentence unreferenced article is serving no useful purpose. AllyD (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.