Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Bent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:27, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep after improvements. ansh666 19:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Bent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References only interviews, youtube and social media, along with non-notable industry blogs. A WP:BEFORE showed only passing mentions. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Drewmutt all the references are not interviews i think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fbofficl (talkcontribs) 10:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think i did the wright thing by adding the article of Kyle Bent. All the References are not interviews. Alao check about him on google please. Anyeay you may decie about it (Fbofficl (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 11:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the deletion template, you may please enquire about KYLE and please take an action about it, and also i have added two referencs to the articles (Fbofficl (talk) 13:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 05:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 05:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This vote needs much more solid reasoning; see WP:DISCUSSAFD. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep - User:Fbofficl has added some pretty good magazine mentions, including Good Music Daily and Vents Magazine. It appears to me that criteria #1 in WP:NBAND is satisfied, but just barely. I cannot find much else on the rapper except for brief mentions of the existence of songs/videos at publications like HipHopDX. I'm not too enthusiastic about the rapper's notability in general, but it looks like some general WP requirements hve been satisfied. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.