Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Ellis (executive producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) BangJan1999 21:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Ellis (executive producer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx (talk) 10:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdwardX, forgive my possible ignorance, but I thought Billboard (magazine) was uber reliable. Maybe it has gone downhill in recent years? FoxxyL (talk) 00:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you FoxxyL. Billboard is a reliable source. On further reflection, the three online Billboard sources are routine announcements in the nature of press releases. However, the two Billboard sources accessed via Google Books are a bit more substantial, particularly the 2007 one for their "Power Players" list, which amounts to a degree of independent commentary. On balance, there is enough coverage in reliable sources to justify an article, so I would be happy to withdraw this nomination. Edwardx (talk) 09:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow nominator to answer the question posed by FoxxyL
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.