Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Rajendra Ratnoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Rajendra Ratnoo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's already survived a PROD so I have no choice other than take it to AfD. I can't find any evidence of this person being notable other than a few passing mentions. Secondly, the page contains absolutely nothing but an infobox and one reference. What the fuck? Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The editor placed the reference in such a manner that he or she probably thought it was going to associate with the infobox. I've at least added one sentence to give it actual readable prose, but I don't see anything to suggest notability. Raymie (t • c) 22:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete An article about a civil servant with no assertion of notability. EricSerge (talk) 01:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Absolutely no sign of notability. StuartDouglas (talk) 21:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Managing director in the administrative service" is not a claim of notability that passes any specific Wikipedia notability guideline, and the quality of sourcing here is not strong enough to even put him over WP:GNG in the first place. Delete with fire. Bearcat (talk) 03:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.