Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dumisani dube

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:38, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 07:53, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dumisani dube[edit]

Dumisani dube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written as a lawyer advertisement, autobiography of a person with little notability. Binko71100 (talk) 19:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Reads like a resume. I'm also concerned that the article was created by user:Dumisanidube; sounds like a COI. Many of the references were invalid. I checked a number of the working ones, and there was nothing indicating notability (little more than a quote from the article subject). There are a fair number of hits in books and scholar, but I can't tell if it's the same person; when I add 'lawyer' to the search, almost all of the the hits disappear. If better sources were provided, I might change my vote.--Larry (talk) 22:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.