Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecole Supérieure Robert de Sorbon
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:42, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Closing as Speedy Delete G11; the contents are essentially an advertisement for the school. DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ecole Supérieure Robert de Sorbon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable alleged diploma mill. Only two sources in the article 1) It's website which claims its not a diploma mill and 2) a French search engine with a "verification needed" tag. If you go to the "school's" webpage and click "apply" you can use paypal to "pay the €500 Euros for Tuition and Diploma fees." Tried finding sources, but could only locate forums that say its a diploma mill. SalHamton (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 01:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Regardless of whether it's a diploma mill or not, they haven't done anything notable. 1292simon (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Also delete the several redirects. SalHamton (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.