Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flex watches

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:03, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flex watches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page, with almost no true third party sources for notability. Extensive name-dropping. DGG ( talk ) 20:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry we've started it but haven't substantiated any of our content other that their overview, definitely need to add the links and about the business and it's history. Do you know if there's a template with blank values on Wikipedia that I can fill in the for the rest of the body text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE22:49B9:20D9:572B:FA3:89B0 (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Promotional article about a subject that fails the inclusion guideline at WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 07:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.