Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immad Akhund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:48, 13 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Immad Akhund[edit]

Immad Akhund (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially-toned page on a nn entrepreneur. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is a lot of self-promotion, interviews, and other WP:SPIP sources. Sourced to likewise unsuitable sources, some of which are routine notices about the subject's company, which has been deleted via PROD. Created by Special:Contributions/Yasnim with four total edits. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 22:01, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  11:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.