Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Costa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:01, 14 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:01, 14 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 03:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Jonathan Costa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Selfpromo (Gibwork is owned by Costa) and fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 20:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The page could have been deleted speedily (WP:CSD#A7), but this discussion gives a new editor a chance to learn and perhaps contribute more usefully. – Fayenatic London 07:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Vanity article with no relable secondary sources.--Rollins83 (talk) 20:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.