User talk:JBchrch

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot @7&6=thirteen! This reminds me of some good times in Budapest a few years ago. JBchrch talk 17:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makes me hungry Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Template:Did you know nominations/Nebraska v. One 1970 2-Door Sedan Rambler (Gremlin) "Fools rush in ..." but lawyers do their research first. Apparently you still have a sense of humor. Thanks for your ameliorative assistance. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of September 2019 events in the U.S. repo market

Congratulations, JBchrch! The article you nominated, September 2019 events in the U.S. repo market, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, your first FA, isn't it? It was educational for me to review the article at FAC. When will it make its main page apperance? September 17, 2022? Any date would work. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is @Kavyansh.Singh! Thank you very much for your message and thanks again for your thorough review. Yes, I'm definitely going to submit it for September 17! JBchrch talk 19:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Might be worth noting it on Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/pending – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh Thanks a lot for the advice! It took some negotiation and intrigue but I got the spot! JBchrch talk 17:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Four Awarded

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on September 2019 events in the U.S. repo market. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot @Theleekycauldron! JBchrch talk 19:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Hill deletion

The claim of stonewalling was made at least 8 times recently there by ACS (and supporters). My comment was a reply to that. If my reply on that subject doesn't belong on that Talk page, then it seems unfair that the comments which it was in response to should remain. Rp2006 (talk) Rp2006 (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rp2006 Doing a cmd+F on the talk page, I see only two stonewalling accusations by A. C. Santacruz, to whom your comment was directed. I can understand, though, that being on the receiving end of such accusations is not really conducive to a productive discussion, so I will ask A.C. if she would be open to refraining from labeling your comments as stonewalling again: both your positions are clear by now, and given the state of this whole thing, I don't think it's very useful to level those kinds of accusations anymore. However, Rp, you should also lay off the attacks, as in this comment [1] which really serves no productive purpose. JBchrch talk 21:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I will refrain from labeling his comments as stonewalling in the future. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 21:23, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Input sought on the Citadel LLC talk page

Hi JBchrch. I recently replied to your remarks on Talk:Citadel. I brought a few sources that more clearly discuss the distinction between Citadel and Citadel Securities and Ken Griffin’s role in the companies. I would appreciate your feedback as to whether you feel these sources properly and more thoroughly address the matter. Thanks. Amandaatcitadel (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]