Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Lamont Johnson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:04, 16 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Was speedy deleted (CSD 12, copyvio) by Premeditated Chaos joe deckertalk 06:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

E. Lamont Johnson[edit]

E. Lamont Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NACTOR. This unsourced article is about an actor who appears to have played several minor roles in small films in the late 1970s and early 1980s [1]. DarjeelingTea (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Doesn't seem notable, but was clearly created by a user with no concern for guidelines since he/she removed the Prod with a disingenuous edit summary, so I'm willing to bet he/she doesn't really have anything to add to prove it's notability.★Trekker (talk) 23:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It may just be a well-meaning, new editor not intimately familiar with the ins and outs of WP policy. (Kind of like me!) DarjeelingTea (talk) 03:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is true, maybe I was a little harsh, but I wish that they would be clearer in their edit summary and actually add some valuable sources now if they would find any.★Trekker (talk) 13:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.