Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 4

< February 3	February 5 >

February 4

File:Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes P.A. Sereno Official.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes P.A. Sereno Official.jpg, this image is likely copyrighted. Even if converted to non-free, it would fail WP:NFCC#1, as the subject is still alive. FASTILY 02:03, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phdb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission is asserted but it there is no proof provided. EXIF shows copyright holder as Tomasz_Mysluk. OTRS confirmation of permission would be needed. Whpq (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert W. Nelmes (Bob) 10955 ~ Then and Now ~ Circa 1977-8 to 2015t.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collage of photos of Robert W Nelmes 10955 from a baby to 2015.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes 10955 in fav suit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes (Bobby) 10955 Grade 2 with first passport photo alongside me.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes (Bobby) 10955 Blackpoint.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes (Bobby) 1964-5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert W Nelmes (Bob) brand new Level 2 18 yrs old.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes (Bobby) 15 yrs old.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes (Bob) circa 27 yrs old.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert W Nelmes (Bob) Feb 8 2015 768 x 1368 2-507 12St South Golden BC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Wayne Nelmes (Bob) dated series of photos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photograph of Edgar Norman Nelmes and Sylvia Charlotte Nelmes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert W Nelmes (Bob) Mar 19 2015 in Golden BC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the subject of the images claim to own the copyright. Files also appear to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2014-09-09 BloombergBusinessweek.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. This one looks like a copyright violation to me. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Hotel-Lobby.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Tang-Court.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Director-Suite.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Hotel-Guest-Room.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-The-Langham-Club-Lounge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Hotel -Ballroom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Rooftop-Swimming-Pool.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Artesian-Bar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:34, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Hotel-Bostonian-Seafood-and-Grill-Restaurant.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The-Langham-Hong-Kong-Main-St-Deli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files look promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 1 Demo Two Hexataves.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 2 ASEAN Cantonese Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 3 Malaysia Cantonese Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 4 Cantonese Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 6 Madarin Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 7 Thai Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 9 English Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 8 Vietnamese Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 10 Malay Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 5 Shanghainese Hexatave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of a file used exclusively on a userspace not-article. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 09:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Convoy off Leyte.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from United States Army in World War II: The War in the Pacific and the author (Moses Hamlin Cannon) died in 1978. Therefore, the image is still copyrighted until 2048. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 10:08, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Henry h rogers bw portrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from A History of and Guide to UNIFORM EDITIONS OF MARK TWAIN'S WORKS and the author (Barbara Schmidt) is still alive. Although the image was pictured before 1909, we still don't know the real date of published. Therefore, the image is still copyrighted. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 10:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The author of the book where the image was found is still alive, but the photographer of the image is certainly not. Given that the image was taken before 1909, it's very likely it was first published before 1923. So, I'd be willing to bet that the image is no longer copyrighted, but we can't know for sure with the information available.--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brest44.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From the source, I don't know whether this image was taken by the US government or a private person. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Museum of Ancient Greek Technology Sign.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Museum of Ancient Greek Technology Sign.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mi5 crest and logotype.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Done -FASTILY 03:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from British intelligence agencies per WP:NFCC#8; there is no critical commentary or contextual significance. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NationalCrimeAgency.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Done -FASTILY 03:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from British intelligence agencies per WP:NFCC#8; there is no critical commentary or contextual significance. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Secret Intelligence Service logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Done -FASTILY 03:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from British intelligence agencies per WP:NFCC#8; there is no critical commentary or contextual significance. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Government Communications Headquarters logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Done -FASTILY 03:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from British intelligence agencies per WP:NFCC#8; there is no critical commentary or contextual significance. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Ballistics Intelligence Service logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Done -FASTILY 03:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove from British intelligence agencies per WP:NFCC#8; there is no critical commentary or contextual significance. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.