Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 July 24
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:10, 25 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
July 24
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lab-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Feel free to upload with a fair use rationale.
- Probably not author's work. --Addihockey10 e-mail 05:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is from the band's site, which contains a Creative Commons by-nc-sa license in the footer. http://firecodecore.com/less/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.147.78 (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Perfect, NC licenses aren't acceptable on Wikimedia. Thanks for spotting that, IP! --Addihockey10 e-mail 18:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 19:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DH Wikipedia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- no proof of ownership other than "own work" this image may be copyrighted Dman41689 (talk) 07:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Not disputed that image is free but sculpture is subject to copyright. Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- File:OwenBradleyStatue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is an image of a statue, but no information on the copyright of the statue has been provided Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to fairuse the subject (person the statue is based on) is dead, so no new free photo of this person can be created. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 07:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it acceptable to use a photo of a (non-free) statue to identify a deceased person? – Quadell (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Qwyrxian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SomaliManhenna'd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File appears to be a cropped and colorized version of this pic. The latter non-colorized, non-cropped composite appears on a number of websites, whereas this new colorized/cropped image is only found on Wikipedia's servers. Cropping is apparent from the missing parts of the pattern on the subject's shirt. The metadata also suggests that the original image was processed/modified before it was uploaded. Middayexpress (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Permission confirmed via OTRS Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Packaging Artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to fairuse it is being used to illustrate the product. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stefanos Olive Oil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Packaging artwork Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 19:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rusyn flag.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as own work, but external source given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep with accurate licensing tag – Quadell (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not own work, it's a signature! Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment signatures are not protected under US WP:TOO per {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} "handwriting" -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:56, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Probably a bit lazy not to create an original diagram from the same source data but I can't see any individual element that is copyrightable. Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Nominally sourced to - Hoisington Investment Management, but this is a simple graph, does this meet TOO? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.