Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 July 4

< July 3	July 5 >

July 4

File:Portrait of Mahmud ghaznavi.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Mahmud ghaznavi.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is widely distributed on the internet and we have neither the original source nor the name of the creator not the date to allow verification of the license. May be a derivative work of an old and PD image, or may be modern. Peripitus (Talk) 04:25, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anbumaniramadoss.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anbumaniramadoss.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is declared as own work, but unlikely. The image is widely used in a variety of sites in a variety of sizes. This site uses the same image size as the upload, and in under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. However, I suspect it is only the data. Larger resolution of the image exist. For example at this Lok Sabha site, the image is larger. I suspect this is an official Indian government photo. Whpq (talk) 15:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cross Of Vanxim (Capão).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cross Of Vanxim (Capão).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The exif data sates the image is © Rajan P. Parrikar from 2011. We either need confirmation that the uploader is this person or a permissions email Peripitus (Talk) 23:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Al-Shaheed Monument 2004.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al-Shaheed Monument 2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is not free. The former license template was incorrect and I've now corrected it per the better detail on the commons one. This image would only be PD if it pre-dated 1999. As a 2004 image it is still copyrighted Peripitus (Talk) 23:58, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.