Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Obstruction cycle
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . No problem restoring if drafter wants the content to merge somewhere else. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
12 word and a ref math stub. Last time G13 declined. No edits in last 6 months. Legacypac (talk) 09:55, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I suppose this can be discussed in characteristic class but the topic is notable enough for a standalone article. — Taku (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Huh? I will contradict my statement that I would start !voting to keep, because this is only a back-of-the-envelope note that could be kept in a user page or project page of back-of-the-envelope notes. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.