Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 November 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:55, 2 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

November 16

[edit]

Category:Albums by YouTube personalities

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Trivial. We don't have a scheme for Category:Albums by media popularity for artists who became famous from radio play or public performance. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Communications technology

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close. No need to nominate a category twice (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A week ago I proposed merging Category:Communications technology and Category:Telecommunications techniques. See here.

User Srleffler commented:

I support elimination of Category:Communications technology. Pretty much everything in the Telecommunications category tree is about technology. It's redundant to have a "technology" category within it; the articles that are/were a random assortment of articles that ought to be in other categories. I've moved a few of them. I oppose blindly moving everything to Category:Telecommunications techniques.--Srleffler (talk) 05:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By now there are no articles left in the category so I suggest it be deleted.

Thank your very much. KaiKemmann (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.