Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agile Molecule
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:58, 4 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 13:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agile Molecule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Software company. Article created by user:Agilemolecule. Are they notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- comment: Doubtful notability. The article gives three sources, but at least the last one seems to be irrelevant. The 1998 paper by A.P.Lyubartsev, A.Laaksonen does mention DynaMix, but not Agile Molecule, as far as I can see. The paper is available at Lyubartsev's home page. (Not that a reference in one scientific paper would be a good source anyway.) --The very model of a minor general (talk)
- Delete No indpendent sources to establish that a usable product even exists, let alone that anybody has paid attention to it. Looie496 (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It should have been speedied off. Being made by the company itself, it seems to me as nothing but an advertisement for themselves. Alexius08 (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The references are not directly relevant to "Agile Molecule". However it does not meet speedy deletion criteria, irrespective of whether it was written by the company. Axl ¤ [Talk] 17:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.