Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lander (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Transformers: Super-God Masterforce characters. (non-admin closure) sst✈^(conjugate) 13:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lander (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor character from the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world significance. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong delete (and all such similar articles). The request to delete is more notable than the article subject itself . . . Just merge them all in one list/table article. Aoziwe (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Nonsense, do not overplay your statements, it defeats their validity. You say strong delete, then your text says merge, make up your mind. Mathewignash (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry I thought I was saying the same thing. I think these types of articles should not exist at all. This is not to say their minimalistic content should not be somewhere else in Wikipedia, hence my merge them [as one liner entries] into a list. (I have just returned to Wikipedia after a seven year absence so if my terminology is not Wiki-idiomatically current, I am happy to stand corrected.) (WP:AGF) Aoziwe (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Transformers: Super-God Masterforce characters. Mathewignash (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested with redirect. VMS Mosaic (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and I would've closed as such myself. SwisterTwister talk 07:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.