Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Coste Lewis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as I think it's safe to say that whatever troubles this article may have, the current sources are enough and acceptable. Note the author LaMona, who frequently participates at these authors AfDs, was apparently not notified at all. Certainly other articles needing AfD instead of this one at this time (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Coste Lewis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for Wikuspedicus (talk · contribs), whose rationale was provided here. They are, of course, invited to revise and extend their remarks. No comment on the merits. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

38 words are not an article - no notability - conflict of interest: author might know described student in person. Even the so called biography is a paraphrased plagiarism from an article used as reference. Original: Lewis is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Southern California with a fellowship in Poetry and Visual Studies. Plagiarism: Lewis is in the Ph.D. program at the University of Southern California. She has a fellowship in Poetry and Visual Studies. Wikuspedicus (talk · contribs) 15:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Subject has seen coverage in the New York Times, the New Yorker, Slate, has published works in several journals and has won a National Book Award. Subject clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. /wia🎄/tlk 17:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.