Talk:CryptoPunks

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 January 2021 by reviewer Liance (talk · contribs).

Cryptocurrency Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

History / Controversies

These sections should likely be rewritten / combined. I'll try to spend some time on it in the coming days. Seanbonner (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've combined these sections for better organization and expanded on the history with additional sources. Seanbonner (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was there any coverage in RSes whatsoever, or just in crypto blogs? If the latter, it doesn't belong here - David Gerard (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've included a number of sources though out the section including [WP:SELFSOURCE] where the owner of the company has made a statement about what they did, the rest are crypto specific news sites discussing a crypto art project so while they may not be considered RS for geopolitical news they are RS for a crypto specific topic as is detailed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Inaccuracy#Appendix:_Reliability_in_the_context . None of the sources I've included are "crypto blogs" and your mass deleting the entire section rather than addressing specific details or sources could be considered [WP:VAND]. Perhaps my restructuring of the page confused you so I'll correct that, in the future please address specific points rather than deleting entire sections. Seanbonner (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, crypto sites are promotional nonsense. If you have no RSes, you have no sources suitable for Wikipedia. If your section is sourced to rubbish, then it's not sourced. Please find a clear WP:NEWSORG even mentioning this stuff, not rubbish sources - David Gerard (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've repeatedly asked you to discuss this and made additional edits to improve the section. As you refuse to discuss specifics and just keep deleting everything I'm taking this to dispute resolution.

[1] Seanbonner (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Donation to Ukrainian Government

Hello, Aside all vandalism and all the unreliable edits that have been made after my edit, I now manually reverted all the edits back to mine. I added a more reliable source regarding the CryptoPunk Ukrainian Government donation. I couldn't do so before because my edit was made 1 hour after the news came out, so I couldn't find much more; but now it should do. Thanks. JohnnyCoal (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]