Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Knight Studios
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk 19:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- White Knight Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Other than the an under-construction website for the company I can find no indication it even exists. Absolutely zero evidence of notability seems to exist. RichardOSmith (talk) 16:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.
Singh (talk) 15:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete seems to meet CSD A7 to me – no credible claim of notability that I can see └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 19:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - That's embarrassing. The website under construction isn't bad except that it appears to be a newly registered domain. That tells me that they aren't even off and running yet. Nothing in Google to even lead me close to the door of notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Probably should have been speedily deleted. Onel5969 TT me 17:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.