Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 Southend United F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I am early closing this under our snowball clause justified by Ignore all rules and saving everybody's time as Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2010–11 Southend United F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, notability, little to no prose Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NSEASONS (you'll notice on {{2010–11 in English football}} that every other Football League club has an article for this season). Needs improvement, not deletion. Number 5 7 16:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NSEASONS as the club was in a professional league. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NSEASONS and as above - every other football league club has a season article for the year.Atlantic306 (talk) 13:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per above. AFD is not cleanup and it's from a FPL so let's just end this already. Smartyllama (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets all guidelines, nominator did not do the research. KaisaL (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.