Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gray (businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Gray (businessman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Number of reasons - Current business has 1-10 employees. Previous business failed. Had success with one but that's unreferenced. Similar company/service exists but does not reference him or any of the story. I'm struggling to see any justification of notability. Poor referencing throughout. Created by SPA. Has had outstanding BLP, notability and orphan issues for 3 years with no fix. Rayman60 (talk) 16:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of the current article suggests better satisfying solidly the applicable notability guidelines. At best restart if and whenever a better article is available. Notifying tagger Miracle Pen in case they're not aware of this current AfD. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found this AfD at Wikipedia:WikiProject Requested articles/Article alerts. Just wondering if the nominator is aware and has investigated before nominating for deletion? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC){{small|please ping[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: No, I was not aware of this. Still not entirely sure what it is, however when I stumbled across the article, it was in a very poor state (admittedly irrelevant for AfD) but as explained in my original reasonings, it seemed to fail notability hence the nomination. Rayman60 (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.