Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Frost (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:59, 19 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Frost (politician)[edit]

Michael Frost (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable local councillor. The article suggests 2 claims to fame. First councillor for UKIP on Bristol City and parliamentary election candidate. In the first case, simply being a local councillor does not establish notability and there are now about 500 UKIP councillors in the UK, which has over 400 local councils, so UKIP winning seats on them rarely attracts the significant news coverage which would satisfy point 3 of WP:POLITICIAN. The only coverage is local news coverage almost all of it in passing, failing WP:BIO. Similarly, being a parliamentary election candidate is not notable in itself and in this case the person finished a distant third with 9% of the vote. Valenciano (talk) 15:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. NN local councillor and failed candidate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.