Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I2Spy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:53, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I2Spy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept/software described here doesn't seem notable; in fact it seems to be a neologism of almost no use, probably some short lived and un-notable marketing buzzword. If anyone can find any reliable sources, go ahead, I couldn't even find this phrase described in the sources present in the article, through it doesn't help that it supposedly is known under several different terms, sigh. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 05:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article is an amalgam of two topics separated by 5 years or so. The earlier Phorm controversy is already sufficiently covered on the page of the same name. Only the latter uses the term I2Spy and is limited to a particular piece of Spyware and its removal, and as per the nominator, I am seeing nothing to meet WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - CatcherStorm ^talk 09:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.